VIDEO: Aussie company fights for survival against US footwear giant Decker over UGG boot trademark
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Discussion of Competition and Consumer Protection Law issues
Search This Blog
Twitter Updates
Posts
About Me
Labels
- ACCC enforcement (87)
- Australian consumer law (34)
- waterfront (23)
- civil penalties (22)
- cartels (21)
- boycott (20)
- banking (14)
- franchising (13)
- price fixing (12)
- mergers (10)
- misuse of market power (10)
- settlements (10)
- unfair contract terms (7)
- UCT (6)
- unconscionable conduct (6)
- European Commission (5)
- Harper (5)
- abuse of dominance (5)
- disqualification orders (5)
- environmental claims (5)
- hold cleaning (5)
- infringement notices (5)
- supermarkets (5)
- Adsense (4)
- Alphabet (4)
- Android (4)
- carbon tax (3)
- search warrants (3)
- Legal professional privilege (2)
- employment restrictions (2)
- generic drugs (2)
- market definition (2)
- negotiation (2)
- price signalling (2)
- product safety (2)
- public warning powers (2)
- substantiation notices (2)
- Google (1)
- clarity in pricing (1)
- divestiture (1)
- non-party redress (1)
- retirement villages (1)
- warranties against defects (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2021
(50)
-
▼
May
(10)
- Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Cit...
- Australian Company Loses Ugg Trademark Battle
- Telstra to pay $50m penalty for unconscionable sal...
- ACCC v Google
- Ugg Case
- Ugg Boot appeal
- Ugg boot case appeal
- Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v S...
- Australian Business Law Review, Vol 49, Part 1
- Recent work - Thermomix (The Mix Australia Pty Ltd)
-
▼
May
(10)
No comments:
Post a Comment