Check out my recent video presentation entitled "The Van Onselen Gamble - Network Ten Pty Limited v van Onselen [2023] NSWSC 829" in which I look at the decision of Hammerschlag CJ in Equity concerning a dispute between Channel 10 and Dr Peter van Onselen. The case involved the enforceability of a non-disparagement clause and whether van Onselen breached that clause. Needless to say van Onselen's gamble didn’t pay off!
Run time 28 mins
Check out my recent presentation entitled UFC (Ultimate Federal Court) Smackdown - Smart Education Program Pty Ltd (in liq) v CLGC Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 826. In this presentation I look at Justice Jackman's recent criticisms of Justice Farrell's delays in finalising, and unwillingness to deliver judgment, in Smart Education Program Pty Ltd (in liq) v CLGC Australia Pty Ltd and ask the question did he go too far?
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_1.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_2.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_3.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_4.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_5.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_6.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_7.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_8.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_9.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_10.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_11.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_12.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_13.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_14.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_15.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_16.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_17.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_18.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_19.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_20.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_21.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_22.png)
%20v%20CLGC%20Australia%20Pty%20Ltd%20%5B2023%5D%20FCA%20826%20PDF_23.png)
Check out my video presentation entitled "The Deceased, His Wife, The Developer and His Lawyer - Kimberley Developments Pty Ltd v Bale [2023] NSWCA 25" in which I look at the recent NSW Court of Appeal decision. I outline the complicated set of relations between the Deceased (Mr Schein), His Wife (Mrs Chyna Schein), the Developer (Mr Albert Darwiche) and His Lawyer (Mr Martin Churchill) and the basis for the finding of unconscionability.
Run time 30 mins
Posts
All Comments
